The Most Pathetic Display of Diplomacy in History

Never in all of the history of international diplomacy has a man who holds all the cards caved so cravenly to the most desperate, the most prostrate and the most vulnerable military aggressor with absolutely nothing with which to bargain in such a short time. The opening paragraph of the Reuters story says it all:

In a few short hours in Alaska, Vladimir Putin managed to convince Donald Trump that a Ukraine ceasefire was not the way to go, stave off U.S. sanctions, and spectacularly shatter years of Western attempts to isolate the Russian president.

 What “mainstream media”–those now completely subservient to the man who wields the FCC as a weapon–will conveniently omit is the fact that American prestige was the most valuable asset traded away in Alaska. American prestige was obliterated in Alaska. It is now plainly manifest, painfully obvious and irrevocably established that the United States will cave to any show of force and that the United States is no longer a leader in the world: the US is now a pitiful lackey of ruthless, insane despots who engage in murderous campaigns against their own people and the world.

See no evil, hear no evil but speak a lot of evil shaking hands with evil.
See no evil, hear no evil but speak a lot of evil shaking hands with evil.

Source: Putin wins Ukraine concessions in Alaska but did not get all he wanted | Reuters

Vote for Quality of Life Needs to Be Recognized As Such

Paris residents vote to make 500 more streets pedestrian 

Though only 4% of the city voters participated in this referendum, no significant opposition against making a city that is extremely pedestrian friendly even more pedestrian friendly. Tempting as it might be to view this as a reflection of “leftist” politics, no doubt exists regarding its being another manifestation of the global movement away from the noise, pollution, inconvenience and nuisance of rampant car culture in cities. In Paris, in particular, pedestrian life that was emphasized during covid lockdowns was reinforced by a magical Olympic experience wherein the entire city became a memorable character in every single sporting event. It is not surprising that people would opt to retain the camaraderie and social connection that car-free streets encourage. Paris is lucky enough to have a superb transportation infrastructure that provides residents with multiple means of getting about town. Absent any significant reduction in mobility, it is obvious that people would prefer to walk, bike or ride subway in order to retain neighborhoods devoid of car noise and pollution. Cities were made for people, after all.

Where are the Borders in the Computing Cloud?

Nominally, the case (linked at the end) is about “privacy”, but the underlying questions are far deeper and far more relevant to anyone who is using any form of “cloud” service: Facebook, Google, Amazon, Apple, Twitter, Microsoft, etc. The government insists that it can access data belonging to a suspect even if that data is stored on a server in another country, but the service company, Microsoft in this case, insists that it cannot provide that data because that act violates the terms under which it operates its servers in Ireland. The question is, therefore, where is the virtual border drawn? Is material belonging to an American subject but stored on a server in a foreign country under a foreign account that was created in that country subject to US law or the laws of the country in which the account was created. A question in the affirmative leads to the following conundrum.

“If U.S. law enforcement can obtain the emails of foreigners stored outside the United States, what’s to stop the government of another country from getting your emails even though they are located in the United States?” Brad Smith, Microsoft’s president and chief legal officer, said in a blog post on Monday.

Where is the line drawn? Does the account belong to the person and, thus, subject to the laws of whichever country in which the person is residing, or is the data owned by the provider and, thus, subject to the laws of the country in which that provider is operating? If the former, then, indeed, foreign countries can have free access to data stored on American servers. This will please Chinese officials who want to identify dissidents. If the latter, then some country–perhaps Ireland–may well become a haven for data akin to the way Switzerland is a haven for money. Neither branch of the dilemma is particularly satisfying. Not solving this problem is an invitation to disaster in the not too distant future as our data slowly come to represent the totality of our existence.

What do we  want as users? Do we want our data to be ours, or do we want to relinquish control to technology companies in order to relieve ourselves of the responsibility of living with the consequences of the data? The breakneck pace of progress in technology doesn’t leave much time for the deep discussion that the subject demands. When the shit hits the fan, it’s going to get really messy. Wear your best virtual rubbers.

Source: U.S. Supreme Court to decide major Microsoft email privacy fight

Cruising in a Houseboat

Amsterdam Tests Residential 1Gbps Fiber – While city muni-fiber operation delivers fiber to the house boat… – dslreports.com.

On some level, it’s infuriating to know that houseboats in Amsterdam get better internet bandwidth than the most luxurious penthouse in Manhattan or San Francisco.

Why Enron Could Never Exist in the European Union

BBC NEWS | Business | EU to investigate electric bills

Funny, nobody ever bothered doing this when Enron was destroying the California economy. It should come as no surprise why the European economy is on much more stable and fundamentally stronger foundation than the American economy, where the big corporations’ right to plunder is the only right that ever seems to get the protection of the law.

[ad]