Requiem for Truth

Not too long ago, I wrote about how Facebook’s flagship products, Facebook and WhatsApp, have been usurped by malicious actors to decimate the truth and to instigate mass action bordering on genocide. Now, as the article linked below demonstrates, we may have the first quantitative measure of how successful such disinformation campaigns are on US soil. If it is correct that 40% of Republicans are as gullible as Burmese, then it is a sad day for the USA: we were done in by our own technologies.

A survey finds a false conspiracy theory about vaccines implanting tracking microchips is popular among Fox News viewers, Republicans and Trump voters.

Source: Over 40% of Republicans wrongly believe conspiracy theory about Bill Gates and COVID-19 vaccines – CNET

Stellar Spectrum Bandwidth

With my trusty Asus AC router and my new MacBook laptop which supports the 80211.AC protocol, I can get Spectrum’s amazingly fast 400 Mbps service on my laptop in my office while my iPad is streaming internet music to my sound bar. This is the incentive to upgrading equipment. It’s hard to imagine needing any more speed for the foreseeable future.

If you got the right equipment, you get the top speeds.

Applying a Band-Aid to a Mortal Wound

Source: WhatsApp imposes even stricter limits on message forwarding

The speed with which social media have been hijacked by malicious forces to achieve ghastly ends is disconcerting. WhatsApp alone has been used to instigate lynchings in India and possibly a genocide in Burma. It is a sign of Facebook’s profound cowardice that it is acting only when a pandemic that affects the entire world–especially Facebook’s country of incorporation, the United States–is in full effect. Even so, the measures they are taking are much too paltry compared to the challenge to be of any use or effect. The quote below from WhatsApp constitutes the epitome of cynicism, the apogee of hypocrisy: after destroying truth, aiding the incitement of genocide and empowering propaganda machines, FaceBook is making a trivial gesture that effects little change beyond the actor making the statement below.

Caveat emptor! If you are getting your news from WhatsApp or Facebook, you are likely an ignoramus.

“We believe it’s important to slow the spread of these messages down to keep WhatsApp a place for personal conversation,” the company added.

Universal Healthcare is Risk Reduction

www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-03-10/germany-and-coronavirus

As the asinine, primordial debate about whether universal healthcare is “socialism” or “capitalism” continues in the United States, it is important to emphasize the fact that it reduces risk to the economy and to the live of people who create the economy. Let’s be as cynical as we can possible get. If the only purpose people serve is to be participants in the marketplace, then health care reduces the risks that contagion like COVID-19 poses to the marketplace, to the economy. Germany seems to get it. Will the US?

FAANG Go to War

Apple was the instigator, and the fire has been fueled by two explosive books about Facebook’s abhorrent behavior–‘Zucked by Roger McNamee–and about the exploitative nature of the free internet in general–Ten Arguments for Deleting your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier. The battle lines have been drawn, and Apple and Microsoft are unofficially allied against Google, Facebook, especially, and, to a lesser extent, Amazon. Let’s examine this battle two ways: idealistically and cynically.

Continue reading “FAANG Go to War”

Wasted Energy

Cut Back on Emails If You Want to Fight Global Warming

Searching the mountain of emails accumulated in your Gmail—or another email—box does not consume much energy, but if hundreds of millions of people are doing so billions of times daily, then the all of that energy adds up to a measurable sum that happens to be gargantuan, as the Bloomberg News article linked above demonstrates.

This is another hallmark of our age of excess. In the era of 9600 baud modems and text-based internet, the average user needed to exercise much consideration in replying because he or she needed to make all compositions thoughtful, relevant and brief in order to justify the time and cost it takes to transmit the message. One actually expected a response in those days, too, so you wanted to make the email considerate enough to elicit a response.

In the era of broadband, the graphical internet has inundated users with an unbounded deluge of emails that cannot be managed by any human. Consequently, large corporations have devised brilliant algorithms to help us manage the deluge of unwanted emails. We marvel and consume the convenience without every asking ourselves if it’s worth resorting to these brilliant algorithms in order to organize shit we never care to read. To make matters worse, wading through all this shit to get to the few emails that are worth reading is now consuming so much energy. We have managed excess very, very poorly.

It’s time to take the pledge, then, to use the “unsubscribe” button at the bottom of unwanted emails. If you want your mailbox to be relevant again, unsubscribe from all email lists, stop subscribing to new email lists–especially the commercial ones like Banana Republic, who sends out 10 emails a day–and start using an email client on your computer. Stop using the web interface to email services. This way you preserve your sanity and the earth. You turn the vicious cycle (get more mail, get lost in your mailbox, use sorting algorithms, get more mail) cycle into a virtuous one (get less mail, read and reply to relevant emails, unsubscribe from irrelevant emails, get less mail). You stop wasting the grid’s energy and your own.

A Quantum Leap Forward in Computing (for Payam only)

Not so long ago, I commented on how it was difficult to justify spending money on a new computer when my prehistoric 2008 MacBook Pro was managing to run Catalina after being equipped with a Samsung Evo solid state drive and using the DOSdude1 patch. Then came Costco’s crazy deal on the discontinued MacBook. The specs on this computer are not spectacular, but as the photo below attests, an upgraded 2008 MacBook Pro still cannot hold a candle to a 2017 computer. As the photo shows, the newer computer is twice as fast on wifi, and easily 20 times faster with all other tasks, especially editing and processing photos. The time savings alone, then, justified the $1100 expense.

2017 MacBook blows away my 2008 MacBook Pro
Differences in specs are staggering. The MacBook is lighter, faster and delivers vastly longer battery life. Its wifi card is twice as fast!

The pictures itself says a lot. The new computer is much smaller, has a vastly superior screen–double the resolution and far less reflectivity–has a battery life nearly times longer (the old computer barely lasts 2 hours on a charge). This table summarizes the objective criteria differences. It’s hard to describe how much easier the higher resolution screen is to read despite its smaller size. The speakers even sound better. I was wrong, after all. It’s nice to have a new computer. Editing photos will no longer be a daylong chore. It won’t take more than 10 minutes.

2008 MacBook Pro2017 MacBook
Weight5.5 pounds2.03 pounds
Battery Life4 hours at best10 hours typical
Screen resolution1440 x 9002304×1440
RAM/SSD Space (gigabytes)4/5128/512
Typical battery life, hours~2~8
Price$1800$1100

Online Ticket Sales Must Be Regulated

The means by which online ticket sales obscure the price of their product must be outlawed. As the picture below demonstrates, the published prices for tickets bear no relationship to the true price that is exacted once various “fees” are exacted at time of purchase. In this particular instance, the outfit that handles the tickets for the Arlington Theater in Santa Barbara, CA, exacts fees that add over 30% to the sales total. Once all fees are added up, the total is 40% higher than the published price the tickets: 2 tickets X $49.50/ticket = $99, but the total is $138, a 40% premium!

Online ticket sales are a ripoff.
Tickets to the Jim Jeffries performance at the Arlington Theater in Santa Barbara, CA, are listed at $49.50, but the total take for two tickets is $138 once fees are added, 40% more than the listed price.

Ticket processing fees were tolerable when they hovered about $10 per ticket processed. Even if they represented a 50% premium for a $20 ticket, they were a reasonable cost to bear for the convenience of electronic ticket delivery. At nearly $20 a ticket, the processing fees no longer represent a small premium to be paid for convenience. These astronomical fees represent a means of inflating ticket prices. As such, they constitute a deceptive business practice and need to be regulated. Laws ought to demand that any fee in excess of $5 per ticket to be plainly advertised next to the ticket price so that the buyer can be aware of the true price of the ticket.

Trump is not a lawyer – Ruth Bader Ginsburg – BBC News

Source: Trump is not a lawyer – Ruth Bader Ginsburg – BBC News

The most important part of this interview with Ruth Bader Ginsburg is not the fact that Donald Trump neither is a lawyer nor has any grasp of the law. His numerous failed business ventures and the Federal consent decree against his rental empire amply testify to his legal and fiduciary incompetence.

The revelation in the interview is the fact that Trump presidency is built entirely on the demonization and harassment of the poor. This scapegoating of the poor manifests itself most strongly in the steps his administration has taken in curbing abortions. The consequence is clearly put by RBG:

“And the truth is that with all these restrictive laws, the only people who are being restricted are poor women.” …”They normally can’t pay a plane fare or the bus fare, they can’t afford to take days off of work to go.”

Trump’s virtue derives entirely from comparing himself with wretched immigrants from Central America and poor women. The immigrants he is placing in de facto concentration camps, and poor women are being forced into unwanted pregnancies that they cannot terminate  because his administration is denying them access to family planning.

The Trump vision of America is, consequently, one in which we are better than the wretched. The fact that this comparison drives our standard of living closer to that of the wretched rather than toward the standards of the privileged in our society seems to have been lost on most. The Trump administration’s singular accomplishment is, therefore, further immiserating the miserable, a task that denigrates us all.